| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
25.16k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
22.28k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
5.18k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
11.97k (x1.53)
TOTAL
60.87k
64.6k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
144.86k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
120.98k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
32.55k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
3.73k (x0.4)
TOTAL
230.91k
302.13k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4