| | | | | | |

Core i7-1185G7 vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 4.7 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a20f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/32
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
1080.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
22.91k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
26.24k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
11.87k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
26.28k (x3.35)
TOTAL
60.87k
87.3k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-1185G7

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
359.17k (x3.84)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
479.04k (x5.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
214.59k (x6.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
28.16k (x3.02)
TOTAL
230.91k
1080.96k (x4.68)

Performance/W
i7-1185G7
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
10295 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4