Core i7-1185G7 vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
20.37k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
22.52k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
10.18k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
21.49k (x2.74)
TOTAL
60.87k
74.56k (x1.22)
Multithread
i7-1185G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
144.01k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
191.86k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
84.53k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
6.5k (x0.7)
TOTAL
230.91k
426.9k (x1.85)
Performance/W
i7-1185G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4