Core i7-1185G7 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1185G7 gets a score of 230.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.87k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
230.91k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1185G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.35k
16.04k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.07k
24.47k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.61k
8.38k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
21.66k (x2.76)
TOTAL
60.87k
70.55k (x1.16)
Multithread
i7-1185G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
93.58k
113.63k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
94.71k
143.55k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.28k
63.84k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.34k
27.34k (x2.93)
TOTAL
230.91k
348.35k (x1.51)
Performance/W
i7-1185G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3383 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1189 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
334 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8247 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1185G7
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5074 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4182 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1793 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
12682 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4