Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a20f12
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
814.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
22.6k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
24.85k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
11.25k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
24.8k (x1.45)
TOTAL
88.34k
83.5k (x0.95)
Multithread
i7-11800H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
258.21k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
342.24k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
155.3k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
59k (x5.41)
TOTAL
607.38k
814.74k (x1.34)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
7759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4