Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
756.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
16.73k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
24.74k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
8.82k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
22.22k (x1.3)
TOTAL
88.34k
72.51k (x0.82)
Multithread
i7-11800H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
248.24k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
309.66k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
140.01k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
58.39k (x5.35)
TOTAL
607.38k
756.3k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4