Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.3 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.3 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a40f41
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
21.04k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
22.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
10.21k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
24.27k (x1.42)
TOTAL
88.34k
77.93k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-11800H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
158.65k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
215.86k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
89.45k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
14.77k (x1.35)
TOTAL
607.38k
478.73k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4