Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
17.57k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
27.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
9.35k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
23.9k (x1.4)
TOTAL
88.34k
78.2k (x0.89)
Multithread
i7-11800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
176.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
219.88k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
100k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
12.93k (x1.19)
TOTAL
607.38k
508.89k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4