Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.5 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.5 times faster than the 1800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
800f11
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
410.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
15.02k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
24.26k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
5.53k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
16.26k (x0.95)
TOTAL
88.34k
61.07k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-11800H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
122.92k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
220.32k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
59.78k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
7.44k (x0.68)
TOTAL
607.38k
410.47k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
4321 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4