| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
292.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
13.83k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
23.16k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
5.15k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
15.18k (x0.89)
TOTAL
88.34k
57.33k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-11800H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
83.44k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
161.53k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
40.62k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
6.72k (x0.62)
TOTAL
607.38k
292.31k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4