| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
303.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
14.08k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
22.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
5.19k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
16.71k (x0.98)
TOTAL
88.34k
58.53k (x0.66)

Multithread

i7-11800H

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
86.62k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
168.1k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
43.51k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
5.16k (x0.47)
TOTAL
607.38k
303.4k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
4668 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4