Core i7-11700F vs i9-9900K
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
906ec
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
545.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
33.62k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
30.02k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
7.17k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
15.43k (x0.8)
TOTAL
89.58k
86.24k (x0.96)
Multithread
i7-11700F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
248.93k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
224.43k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
53.39k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
18.54k (x4.87)
TOTAL
512.32k
545.3k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
5740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4