Core i7-11700F vs i5-7200U
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
806e9
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
19.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
17.47k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
4.08k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
4.04k (x0.21)
TOTAL
89.58k
44.94k (x0.5)
Multithread
i7-11700F
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
42.86k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
41.3k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
9.69k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.68k (x0.97)
TOTAL
512.32k
97.52k (x0.19)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4