Core i7-11700F vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
860f01
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2021
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
14.87k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
21.53k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
8.39k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
8.21k (x0.43)
TOTAL
89.58k
53k (x0.59)
Multithread
i7-11700F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
124.63k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
158.62k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
69.79k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
7.53k (x1.98)
TOTAL
512.32k
360.57k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4