Core i7-11700F vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
860f01
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
16.59k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
23.51k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
9.38k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
7.98k (x0.41)
TOTAL
89.58k
57.47k (x0.64)
Multithread
i7-11700F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
152.43k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
195.79k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
83.2k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
5.38k (x1.41)
TOTAL
512.32k
436.8k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4