| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
706e5
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.48k
4.05k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
20.99k
15.29k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.58k
9.04k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.24k
10.54k (x0.5)
TOTAL
60.28k
38.92k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
44.15k
9.05k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
196.6k
33.88k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.57k
15.34k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
6.74k (x0.63)
TOTAL
353.96k
65.01k (x0.18)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.05k
7.07k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
26.13k
10.55k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.92k
5.27k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.22k
5.66k (x0.27)
TOTAL
79.32k
28.56k (x0.36)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
160.49k
25.28k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
225.25k
37.48k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.88k
17.77k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
6.92k (x0.65)
TOTAL
510.25k
87.45k (x0.17)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.96k
13.9k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
28.34k
20.13k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.26k
9.41k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.2k
10.59k (x0.52)
TOTAL
80.76k
54.03k (x0.67)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
164.31k
55.4k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
253.96k
59.01k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.28k
22.83k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.65k
6.7k (x0.63)
TOTAL
544.2k
143.94k (x0.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
25.53k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
19.99k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
9.31k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
10.81k (x0.49)
TOTAL
98.87k
65.64k (x0.66)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
58.46k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
57.31k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
20.1k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
6.81k (x0.64)
TOTAL
728.98k
142.69k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4