Core i7-11700 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 2.2 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 2.2 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
800f82
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
15.75k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
26.29k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
5.91k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
18.48k (x0.84)
TOTAL
98.87k
66.44k (x0.67)
Multithread
i7-11700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
94.49k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
182.53k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
45.95k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
10.15k (x0.95)
TOTAL
728.98k
333.12k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i7-11700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4