Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 180.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 180.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206c2
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
8.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
5.82k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
3.47k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
2.98k (x0.27)
TOTAL
61.62k
21.04k (x0.34)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
53.23k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
39.35k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
27.05k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
5.28k (x0.44)
TOTAL
180.32k
124.92k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1821 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1307 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
429 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
6440 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3082 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5144 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
13112 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4