Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206d7
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
28 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
8.76k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
7.35k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
3.86k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
3.32k (x0.31)
TOTAL
64.32k
23.28k (x0.36)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
78.51k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
66.46k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
36.42k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
3.88k (x0.32)
TOTAL
190.12k
185.26k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1928 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3170 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
434 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
6790 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3462 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5476 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2447 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2302 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4