| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 3.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
35.87k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
31.43k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
7.34k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
15.73k (x1.85)
TOTAL
62.1k
90.37k (x1.46)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
377.56k (x4.56)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
347.59k (x4.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
88.08k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
12.24k (x1.04)
TOTAL
210.4k
825.47k (x3.92)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4