Core i7-1165G7 vs i7-4820K
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306e4
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
11.85k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
11.84k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
4.69k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
4.12k (x0.38)
TOTAL
64.32k
32.49k (x0.51)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
47.65k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
54.81k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
21.56k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
10.05k (x0.83)
TOTAL
190.12k
134.08k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1928 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3170 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
434 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
6790 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3462 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5476 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2447 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2302 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4