| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
487.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.77k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
19.81k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
6.29k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
14.03k (x1.27)
TOTAL
45.84k
44.9k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
31.21k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
151.01k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
50.13k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
8.37k (x0.69)
TOTAL
129.81k
240.71k (x1.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
17.17k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
25.26k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
6.7k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
13.81k (x1.25)
TOTAL
61.62k
62.95k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
116.68k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
187.28k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
51.52k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
8.39k (x0.7)
TOTAL
180.32k
363.87k (x2.02)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
16.14k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
24.74k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
5.98k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
12.7k (x1.17)
TOTAL
64.32k
59.55k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
117.03k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
199.88k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
50.64k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
8.23k (x0.68)
TOTAL
190.12k
375.77k (x1.98)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
30.38k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
27.95k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
6.51k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
14.37k (x1.69)
TOTAL
62.1k
79.2k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
216.18k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
210.82k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
51.57k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
8.47k (x0.72)
TOTAL
210.4k
487.05k (x2.31)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4