| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i5-9500


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.45k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
18.43k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
5.84k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
12.63k (x1.14)
TOTAL
45.84k
41.34k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
24.75k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
103.1k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
32.43k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
5.56k (x0.46)
TOTAL
129.81k
165.85k (x1.28)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.06k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
23.19k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
6.1k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
12.79k (x1.16)
TOTAL
61.62k
58.14k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
90.44k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
131.23k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
33.85k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
5.59k (x0.46)
TOTAL
180.32k
261.11k (x1.45)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
16.14k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
24.18k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
5.87k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
12.5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
64.32k
58.69k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
92.21k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
137.92k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
33.12k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
5.56k (x0.46)
TOTAL
190.12k
268.8k (x1.41)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
29.17k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
25.49k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
5.84k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
13.15k (x1.54)
TOTAL
62.1k
73.65k (x1.19)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
166.66k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
146.9k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
34.04k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
5.25k (x0.45)
TOTAL
210.4k
352.84k (x1.68)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4