| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.3k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
16.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
5.25k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
12.61k (x1.14)
TOTAL
45.84k
38.72k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
18.1k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
79.16k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
26.75k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
13.81k (x1.14)
TOTAL
129.81k
137.82k (x1.06)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
26.28k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
23.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
5.52k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
12.96k (x1.52)
TOTAL
62.1k
68.14k (x1.1)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
163.67k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
159.74k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
39k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
7.56k (x0.64)
TOTAL
210.4k
369.97k (x1.76)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4