| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i3-10100T


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.32k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
15.7k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
5.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
7.68k (x0.69)
TOTAL
45.84k
32.73k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
16.59k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
71.1k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
23.26k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
3.86k (x0.32)
TOTAL
129.81k
114.81k (x0.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
13.84k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
19.79k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
5.28k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
8.31k (x0.75)
TOTAL
61.62k
47.22k (x0.77)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
54.67k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
90.71k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
24.11k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
3.85k (x0.32)
TOTAL
180.32k
173.34k (x0.96)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
13.88k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
20.94k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
5.18k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
8.2k (x0.76)
TOTAL
64.32k
48.19k (x0.75)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
54.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
93.17k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
23.34k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
3.85k (x0.32)
TOTAL
190.12k
175.24k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
24.31k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
22.15k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
5.14k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.46k (x0.99)
TOTAL
62.1k
60.06k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
101.48k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
98.04k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
24.28k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
3.86k (x0.33)
TOTAL
210.4k
227.67k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4