| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
687.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.39k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
16.99k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
7.74k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
24.57k (x2.22)
TOTAL
45.84k
53.69k (x1.17)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
48.45k (x3.09)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
230.81k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
122.82k (x3.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
54.73k (x4.5)
TOTAL
129.81k
456.8k (x3.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
16.59k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
24.55k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
8.55k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
26.28k (x2.39)
TOTAL
61.62k
75.97k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
181.33k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
261.01k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
126.62k (x3.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
66.64k (x5.54)
TOTAL
180.32k
635.6k (x3.52)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
16.16k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
23.75k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
9.32k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
23.17k (x2.14)
TOTAL
64.32k
72.4k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
174.73k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
275.63k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
125.65k (x3.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
44.17k (x3.64)
TOTAL
190.12k
620.18k (x3.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
16.85k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
26.03k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
9.54k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
22.55k (x2.65)
TOTAL
62.1k
74.97k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
229.41k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
292.81k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
128.48k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
36.8k (x3.14)
TOTAL
210.4k
687.5k (x3.27)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4