| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
327.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
15.5k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
22.96k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
8.78k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.5k (x1)
TOTAL
62.1k
55.74k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
110.78k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
149.38k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
60.88k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
6.68k (x0.57)
TOTAL
210.4k
327.72k (x1.56)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
21848 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4