Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
373.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
15.48k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
22.91k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
7.1k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
21.11k (x2.48)
TOTAL
62.1k
66.61k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
90.39k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
139.1k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
53.2k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
90.92k (x7.76)
TOTAL
210.4k
373.61k (x1.78)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
5748 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4