Core i7-1165G7 vs FX 9590
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
600f20
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
28 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
11.51k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
9.57k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
4.19k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
7.14k (x0.66)
TOTAL
64.32k
32.41k (x0.5)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
55.13k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
51.69k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
27.02k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
3.81k (x0.31)
TOTAL
190.12k
137.65k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1928 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3170 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
434 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
6790 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3462 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5476 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2447 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2302 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4