Core i7-1165G7 vs i7-1195G7
Description
Both models i7-1165G7 and i7-1195G7 are based on Tiger Lake architecture.
It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
806c2
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
239.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.57k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
17.21k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
9.97k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
14.98k (x1.35)
TOTAL
45.84k
46.75k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
12.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
45.98k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
27.86k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
20.06k (x1.65)
TOTAL
129.81k
106.66k (x0.82)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
30.89k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
25.57k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
10.64k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
15.66k (x1.84)
TOTAL
62.1k
82.77k (x1.33)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
96.34k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
95.75k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
32.29k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
15.2k (x1.3)
TOTAL
210.4k
239.58k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4