Core i5-11400F vs i7-10700
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a0655
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
30.66k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
25.64k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
5.98k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
12.25k (x0.66)
TOTAL
88.34k
74.53k (x0.84)
Multithread
i5-11400F
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
240.28k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
234.3k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
56.12k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.02k (x0.75)
TOTAL
495.65k
537.73k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4