| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400F vs i5-10600K


Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a0655
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
352.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
30.11k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
26.16k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
6.01k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
10.77k (x0.58)
TOTAL
88.34k
73.05k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-11400F

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
158.82k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
150.39k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
36.56k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
7.11k (x0.76)
TOTAL
495.65k
352.88k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i5-11400F
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4