| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 3700X


Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
870f10
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
74.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
491.15k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
16.81k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
26.39k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
8.82k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
22.73k (x1.23)
TOTAL
88.34k
74.75k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-11400F

3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
170.29k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
213.21k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
96.03k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
11.62k (x1.24)
TOTAL
495.65k
491.15k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
3280 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
1477 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
7556 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
3821 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5998 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
2005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
16990 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4