Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a50f00
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
22.16k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
24.46k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
10.71k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
22.44k (x1.21)
TOTAL
88.34k
79.76k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-11400F
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
112.5k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
153.92k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
67.75k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
11.47k (x1.22)
TOTAL
495.65k
345.64k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i5-11400F
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4