| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
870f10
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
348.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
16.04k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
24.47k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
8.38k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
21.66k (x1.17)
TOTAL
88.34k
70.55k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-11400F

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
113.63k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
143.55k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
63.84k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
27.34k (x2.91)
TOTAL
495.65k
348.35k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-11400F
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4