| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400F vs i9-12900KF


Description
The i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400F gets a score of 495.6 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 2.5 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
90672
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
495.65k points
1219.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400F
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
31.66k
57.05k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.21k
29.66k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
16.48k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.5k
17.78k (x0.96)
TOTAL
88.34k
120.97k (x1.37)

Multithread

i5-11400F

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
210.36k
546.04k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
203.84k
437.01k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.05k
211.36k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.4k
24.92k (x2.65)
TOTAL
495.65k
1219.33k (x2.46)

Performance/W
i5-11400F
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3236 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3136 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
145 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
7625 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400F
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7196 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2718 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4205 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
20076 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4