| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.7 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
50654
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
18.78k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
16.25k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
3.99k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
6.8k (x0.37)
TOTAL
86.11k
45.82k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-11400

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
133.55k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
108.43k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
30.02k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
9.48k (x1.2)
TOTAL
489.31k
281.48k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i5-11400
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4