| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400 vs i9-9880H


Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.3 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
906ed
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
381.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
27.81k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.88k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
5.65k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
14.19k (x0.78)
TOTAL
86.11k
73.53k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-11400

i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
175.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
166.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
35.04k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
4.23k (x0.54)
TOTAL
489.31k
381.53k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-11400
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
8478 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4