| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400 vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
706e5
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
23.2k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
21.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
9.4k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
11.54k (x0.64)
TOTAL
86.11k
65.35k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-11400

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
94.68k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
103.38k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
35.79k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
9.33k (x1.18)
TOTAL
489.31k
243.18k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i5-11400
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4