Core i5-11400 vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a50f00
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
20.37k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
22.52k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
10.18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
21.49k (x1.18)
TOTAL
86.11k
74.56k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-11400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
144.01k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
191.86k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
84.53k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
6.5k (x0.82)
TOTAL
489.31k
426.9k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i5-11400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4