Core i5-11400 vs i7-1195G7
Description
The i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400 gets a score of 489.3 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
806c2
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
86.11k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
489.31k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-11400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
31.23k
30.89k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.88k
25.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.83k
10.64k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.17k
15.66k (x0.86)
TOTAL
86.11k
82.77k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-11400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
213.85k
96.34k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
195.51k
95.75k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.06k
32.29k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.89k
15.2k (x1.93)
TOTAL
489.31k
239.58k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i5-11400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3290 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3008 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
7528 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-11400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7098 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5881 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2461 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4130 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
19570 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4