| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
2.6k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
7.55k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
2.61k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
2.03k (x0.23)
TOTAL
39.34k
14.79k (x0.38)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
17.41k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
75.46k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
26.25k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
4.65k (x0.63)
TOTAL
101.16k
123.78k (x1.22)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
8.22k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
12.06k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
4.01k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
2.89k (x0.3)
TOTAL
56.64k
27.18k (x0.48)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
61.34k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
90.21k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
26.2k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
4.62k (x0.69)
TOTAL
141.4k
182.37k (x1.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
6.04k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
10.18k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
2.74k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
2.41k (x0.26)
TOTAL
58.83k
21.37k (x0.36)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
47.51k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
75.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
19.72k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
5.45k (x0.76)
TOTAL
157.08k
147.8k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
12.16k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
11.82k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
3.02k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
2.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
68.08k
29.39k (x0.43)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
103.77k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
102.28k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
26.13k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
5.65k (x0.54)
TOTAL
237.55k
237.83k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4