| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 5.2 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
28 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.52k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
17.94k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.5k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
9.64k (x1.09)
TOTAL
39.34k
37.6k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
84.93k (x6.84)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
409.55k (x7.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
122.88k (x4.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
22.12k (x3)
TOTAL
101.16k
639.48k (x6.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
16.03k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
23.95k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
6.03k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
9.37k (x0.96)
TOTAL
56.64k
55.38k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
316.11k (x7.86)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
503.75k (x7.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
131.82k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
22.24k (x3.34)
TOTAL
141.4k
973.92k (x6.89)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
16.4k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
20.97k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
5.82k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
8.86k (x0.94)
TOTAL
58.83k
52.05k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
316.84k (x6.93)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
461.09k (x6.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
129.82k (x4.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
22.09k (x3.08)
TOTAL
157.08k
929.85k (x5.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
29.53k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
22.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.99k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
10.22k (x1.17)
TOTAL
68.08k
68.33k (x1)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
587.06k (x6.21)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
496.41k (x5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
134.66k (x4.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
22.99k (x2.19)
TOTAL
237.55k
1241.12k (x5.22)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4