Core i5-1135G7 vs i7-8650U
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
806ea
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
21.61k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
19.69k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
4.61k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
9.95k (x1.1)
TOTAL
69.38k
55.86k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
78.38k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
72.02k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
16.95k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
6.15k (x0.51)
TOTAL
262.07k
173.49k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4