| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-2500K


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 148.7 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2500K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
206a7
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
111.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.2k
11.84k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
10.43k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.05k
5.22k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.53k
5.36k (x0.56)
TOTAL
59.23k
32.85k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
43.69k
45.51k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
70.25k
40.83k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
20.7k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.24k
4.79k (x0.77)
TOTAL
148.66k
111.83k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
1560 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2509 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1017 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
223 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
5309 points/W
1177 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3618 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5585 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2631 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2268 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
14103 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4