| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10500T


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.87k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
15.79k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.1k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
12.13k (x1.38)
TOTAL
39.34k
36.89k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
22.17k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
101.79k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
34.13k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
3.74k (x0.51)
TOTAL
101.16k
161.83k (x1.6)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
13.94k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
20.01k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
5.34k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
11.41k (x1.17)
TOTAL
56.64k
50.7k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
82.18k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
124.23k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
35.6k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
3.73k (x0.56)
TOTAL
141.4k
245.75k (x1.74)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
14.01k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.4k
21.17k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.9k
5.21k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.41k
11.42k (x1.21)
TOTAL
58.83k
51.82k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.69k
82.38k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
74.42k
115.64k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.8k
32.22k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.71k (x0.52)
TOTAL
157.08k
233.94k (x1.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
25.16k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
22.28k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.18k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
11.97k (x1.38)
TOTAL
68.08k
64.6k (x0.95)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
144.86k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
120.98k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
32.55k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
3.73k (x0.36)
TOTAL
237.55k
302.13k (x1.27)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4