| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10500


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.77k
4.52k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
18.52k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.58k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
14.2k (x1.69)
TOTAL
38.66k
42.82k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
25.26k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
76.62k
120.48k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.56k
38.12k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.5k
7.68k (x1.71)
TOTAL
132.53k
191.54k (x1.45)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
16.3k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
23.22k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
6.22k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
14.05k (x1.44)
TOTAL
56.64k
59.79k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
92.61k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
147.68k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
40.71k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
7.78k (x1.17)
TOTAL
141.4k
288.77k (x2.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.2k
16.33k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
23.46k
24.73k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.05k
5.99k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.53k
13.64k (x1.43)
TOTAL
59.23k
60.69k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
43.69k
91.64k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
70.25k
158.71k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.48k
39.84k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.24k
7.76k (x1.24)
TOTAL
148.66k
297.94k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
28.73k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
26.01k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
6.08k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
14.46k (x1.6)
TOTAL
69.38k
75.27k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
172.66k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
167.57k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
39.45k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
8.31k (x0.69)
TOTAL
262.07k
387.99k (x1.48)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
5969 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4