| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.77k
4.3k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
16.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.25k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
12.61k (x1.5)
TOTAL
38.66k
38.72k (x1)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
18.1k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
76.62k
79.16k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.56k
26.75k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.5k
13.81k (x3.07)
TOTAL
132.53k
137.82k (x1.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
26.28k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
23.38k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
5.52k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
12.96k (x1.43)
TOTAL
69.38k
68.14k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
163.67k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
159.74k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
39k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
7.56k (x0.63)
TOTAL
262.07k
369.97k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4