| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs i5-10400


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 262.1 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.38k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
262.07k points
372.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.46k
26.43k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
23.89k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.24k
5.63k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
12.1k (x1.34)
TOTAL
69.38k
68.04k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
105.02k
163.14k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
108.51k
161.5k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.5k
39.94k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.04k
7.6k (x0.63)
TOTAL
262.07k
372.19k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3875 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
9359 points/W
5726 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
6299 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5626 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2439 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2154 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
16518 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4