Core i5-1135G7 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 141.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 141.4 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
906c0
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
13.43k
10.08k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
10.11k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.18k
4.06k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.75k
2.36k (x0.24)
TOTAL
56.64k
26.6k (x0.47)
Multithread
i5-1135G7
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
40.24k
36.86k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
65.99k
38.51k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.51k
15.17k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
2.72k (x0.41)
TOTAL
141.4k
93.26k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-1135G7
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
1437 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2357 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1018 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
5050 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
3197 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2661 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2321 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
13486 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4